Below is a press statement by Festus Keyamo on the conviction of Henry
Ukah in South Africa.
The decision of the South African Court that
convicted Henry Okah this morning of charges relating to terrorism is
politically motivated and legally incorrect.
As counsel to Charles Okah and others who are facing the same set of
charges under Nigerian Laws, I have been actively involved in coordinating the
trials both in South Africa and in Nigeria.
The fundamental flaw in the trial is that Henry Okah was not given
adequate facilities and the opportunity to defend himself. This is because
after the prosecution closed its case in South Africa, the defence attorneys
and my Chambers here in Abuja tried frantically to summon the witnesses of
Henry Okah who are based here in Nigeria to testify on his behalf. These
witnesses include some government officials.
In this regard, we wrote to the Attorney-General of
the Federation who replied and directed that Henry’s counsel in South Africa
apply to the court there for an order to secure the legal assistance of the
Attorney-General of Nigeria. This was only two weeks ago (please,
find attached a copy of the letter from the Attorney-General of the Federation
to my office and note that the date on the letter was mistakenly given as 8th
January, 2012 instead of 2013.)
Without giving Henry’s counsel in South Africa
adequate time and facilities to follow the directives, the South African court
foreclosed his opportunity to call witnesses and rushed to convict him. This is
a breach of his fundamental right to fair hearing and an obvious attempt by the
South African authorities to please Nigeria at all cost. That is why the
judgment is nothing but political.
Whilst all Nigerians empathise with those who lost
their lives and limbs in the October 1, 2010 bombing, it is wrong to convict
anybody for it without due process. Henry has been convicted without due
process.
I condemn this judgment and call on Nigerians and
the international community to condemn the trial and judgment of Henry Okah
whose only offence was his refusal to accept the so-called amnesty offered by
the Yar’Adua-Jonathan administration and his insistence on the Niger-Delta
controlling its resources.
With the recent condemnation of Jonathan by some
militants who initially accepted the amnesty programme, I am sure they now know
that Henry Okah was correct not to have accepted the poisoned chalice called
amnesty.
The Nigerian government must immediately use all
diplomatic efforts to ensure that Henry Okah does not die in a South African
prison and for the South African government to grant him unconditional pardon.
This is without prejudice to his right to appeal against the judgment.
Thank you.
Festus Keyamo, ESQ.
Don’t
forget to like us on Facebook: LA2LAGOS
on Facebook
Don’t
forget to follow us on twitter: LA2LAGOS on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment